Intelligent Metrix

Data to Metrics to Insight to Intelligent Decisions

Getting On the Same Page – Marketing and the Business

This week, VisionEdge Marketing released the findings of it’s 8th Annual Marketing Performance Measurement and Management (MPM) survey.  The finding that resonated with me the most was the disconnect between Marketing Leadership and CEOs.  

Only 17% of CEOs would give marketing an ‘A’ where as 48% of Marketing Leadership thinks this is the grade they would receive.

At the heart of this, Marketing has been unable to clearly articulate the value it brings to the business. While Marketing is building programs and activities to drive toward business goals, communicating impact is hampered by an inability to measure performance effectively.  So, as metrics that are tracked to see if functional and operational goals (response rate, lead volume, etc) at campaign and program levels are showing desired results, they aren’t being linked to executive metrics.  When CEOs want to know about Marketing’s impact on the business, Marketing is talking about the details.

Marketing does recognize that there are issues as they express dissatisfaction with the ability to measure and track marketing performance.  The marketing operations function has reached a maturity level within marketing organizations and dashboards if not implemented are part of the plan for 2009.  However, analytic skills, process, tools, and data all need further focus to implement a best practices approach.  Training would help to get Marketing to connect activities to the business faster and with less missteps, however, little training budget is available as part of MPM initiatives.

In a down economy, Marketing cannot afford to be perceived as marginally effective and CEOs may be shooting themselves in the foot by reducing marketing budgets and resources.  Marketing needs to build tighter alignment between what it measures to business outcomes and show the value it brings, as well as how it is moving business forward.

*I partnered with Laura Patterson, the President of VisionsEdge Marketing, to help with data analysis and writing this report.  While the full report is for sale, I am not receiving any portion of the profits.  My role was only in the creation of the report.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Archiving Strategy: Data Relevance

We often think of the relavence of data when we want to include or exclude it from analysis or process.  However, are you thinking about relavence as part of your data quality effort?

Just as you focus data quality efforts to clean existing information, there are invariably records that can’t be cleansed or enhanced.  They have no value in either business analytics or business process.  They are noise, similar to the noise you have when there is bad data.  To save and maintain them in your database can affect your ability to accurately analyze information, continue to deflate confidence in data, and if a significant percentage of your database, will cause problems in performance and added maintenance.  Developing an archival strategy as part of your data quality practice is a significant component that should not be overlooked.

Benefits of Data Relevance

  • Trust in data
  • Enables process
  • Accuracy of analysis
  • Supports decisions
  • Database optimization

It can be tempting to simply delete records from your databases.  Though, this can have a detrimental affect due to data dependencies within your databases as well as causing non-compliance in regulated environments.  Instead, it is best to formulate a strategy that flags non-relevant data removing or suppressing it from user interfaces and analytics.

Components of Archiving Strategy

  • Data decay rates – Attributes of records that loose relevance over time.  This component is a good guide on the frequency at which you will focus cleansing efforts.  It also provides an indicator on when data is approaching a horizon when a record will lose its relevance.  Age of the data and activity related to a record, even if a record is complete, can signify whether the data is relavant and open to archiving.
  • Minimum requirements of record viability – Records should continually be assessed to determine if they meet the minimum standards of use.  Failure to meet minimum requirements is a leading indicator that the record is a candidate for archiving.
  • Relevance of record to analysis, process, decisions – If a record is not going to be used in analysis, process, or decision making, there is not need to keep it in use.  This may be the case if processes have been optimized and certain information is no longer needed.  Or, it could be that it was a candidate for archiving due to decay rates and minimum data requirements.  Additionally, relavance may be determined when integrating systems where old records with old transaction history is not relevant to the existing or new business.
  • Regulatory compliance – In highly regulated environments like health care, there are standards on what you can and cannot remove.  Records may not be useful in existing process, analysis, and decision making, but might be required in certification or other compliance related activities.  Archiving ensures that information is not deleted from primary systems.  Although, you may have to provide a mechanism that provides adequate access to data for compliance.

An archiving strategy is a critical component of data quality best practices.  It will continually help you focus on improving and refining your data quality projects as well as thinking strategically about how you use and manage your data on a daily basis.  Establish an archiving strategy at the forefront of your data quality initiatives and you start your efforts off on the right foot.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Filed under: Uncategorized, , , , , , , , , , ,

Stuck in First Gear

porscheBig investments were made in recent years in IT.  IBM, Oracle/Siebel and SAP lead the market and were successful not only with the multi-national enterprise companies but, also with mid-sized companies.  There are a lot of companies out there that have purchased application and data management/data warehouse solutions only to find themselves using a portion of what it could do.  It’s like driving a Porcshe in first gear.

There are some fundamental reasons for this, outside of the fact that companies may feel it is the fault of their sales execute selling them the wrong bill of goods.  IT will blame the business for not knowing what it wants.  The business will blame IT for not getting it.  Doesn’t really matter, there is plenty of blame to go around.  What matters is that now you have a solution that isn’t giving you the benefits that it really could and should be.

Maybe I’m a bit biased since I’m the data chick.  Well, more than a bit.  Regardless, I think that from a data management perspective, companies are failing.  The maniacal focus on process efficiency has drowned out the fact that process runs on data and feeds data.  This focus has put data in the back seat too long and now when we need it to better understand our customers, our business, and make decisions, it is sorely lacking.  Our data lacks unity, structure, definition, and most of all purpose.  Companies simply cannot leverage their information except at very basic levels.  When things are good, this may be okay.  When things are bad, this is a real problem.

What makes this even more sad, is that companies are looking to spend more money on applications and data infrastructure to ‘fix’ the problem.  The promise of the new model and more sophisticated bells and whistles that will solve anything you throw at it is just marketing.  Until you can understand and control what you already have under your hood, getting something bigger, better, and shinier isn’t going to help anymore than it does now.  So, there was no ROI on existing purchases and there won’t be any ROI on new purchases.

There are two things companies need to do to make the investments in enterprise solutions worthwhile:

  • Clean-up the back-end data management practice so that it is fluid with business process and application usage.
  • Have a clear data management strategy for new applications that is fluid and scalable outside of application databases.

Your company may already be embarking on SOA or MDM projects.  But, have you looked at how these new practices will support applications outside of changing the oil?  Can the data drive process?

Today, applications are bogged down because data is treated as something to put in the trunk and horde.  Until data is thought of as fuel, you’re IT investments will stay in 1st gear and never get to 6th.  Now how fun is that?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Filed under: Uncategorized, , , , , , , ,